Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira Road
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indira Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find any reliable sources that even briefly mention this road. - EdoDodo talk 17:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think this is actually a neighborhood of Dhaka, not a road. Either way it's completely unverified, and I can't find any reliable sources to even verify its existence, much less its notability. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There's a plethora of sources mentioning the subject and verifying its existence here and here, so the arguments above don't hold water. I have to go to bed now so I'll leave it to others to go through those sources to check for notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources mention the subject, but most of them only do so as part of an address on the road itself (which isn't even the subject of the article), and there don't appear to be any sources which meet the GNG, which is necessary for neighborhoods. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so those sources prove its existence, but they're only brief mentions, that do not establish notability. - EdoDodo talk 15:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MILL. Sources demonstrate coverage sufficient to found a presumption of notability per WP:N; however that presumption is rebutted by the road, and its coverage, being "common, everyday, ordinary" and of a kind that "does not stand out from all the rest". In short, no evidence that this road is more notable than any other road. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.